<< Back to Articles for Artists
Bartering Art? Don't Forget the Tax Man
Barters and trades of goods and services represent an increasingly
significant percentage of our economy, especially since the advent of organized barter and trade exchanges. Artists barter their art all the time. Peter Max, to
cite a high-profile example, was once involved in a dispute with the IRS over the amount of tax owed on art that he bartered. With these facts in mind, now is a good time to review the tax laws pertaining to barter and trade in the United States.
The two possible types of trade or barter are known as "retail trade
exchange" and "corporate barter." The law states that
appropriate state, local, and federal taxes must be paid on either type of transaction. Corporate barter only applies to multi-million dollar companies. Retail trade exchange is what artists normally engage in and what is at issue
An example of a retail trade exchange would be an artist trading a painting
to a furniture store for a $1000 dining room table. For each party involved,
the government views that trade as two separate and distinct $1000 cash
transactions. (1) The artist "sells" a painting for $1000 and
(2) "buys" a dining room table for $1000 (visa versa for the store
owner). As a "sale," that $1000 is viewed as income (income taxes
apply). As a "buy," that $1000 is viewed as a retail purchase
(sales taxes apply). In other words, the artist and the store owner each
owe state and federal income taxes on $1000 worth of income and state and
local sales taxes on $1000 worth of retail purchases.
If, however, the artist trades the painting to an art store for $1000
worth of art supplies, her tax ramifications are slightly different (they
remain the same for the art store owner). The "sale" of the painting
for $1000 is still taxable as income and the "buy" of the art
supplies for $1000 is still taxable as a retail sale. But because those
supplies are used to make art, the artist can now deduct them as a $1000
business expense. In other words, the $1000 worth of income is offset by
the $1000 deduction.
This information was provided by Steve Goldbloom of the former Bay Area and Hawaii Barter Exchange. His company, like most barter and trade exchanges, handled art. When I mentioned the Peter Max tax dispute as my reason for calling, Mr. Goldbloom informed me that not only does he have Max's work hanging
in his office, but that Max's work and that of other artists are also available
through his company.
According to Goldbloom, Bay Area and Hawaii Barter and Exchange oversaw
all tax collecting. Members paid all sales taxes in cash whenever they made
transactions. As for state and federal income taxes, members received 1099
Forms at the end of each tax year stating the total amounts of their
"sales" of goods or services during that year.
What surprised me in researching this article is that more artists make
their art available through barter and trade exchanges than I thought. This
is apparently a very viable income option for certain artists, especially
those whose names and art are relatively recognizable. As a member, an artist
can receive just about any goods or services that she would normally pay
for simply by trading art. Artists who think that they can make this type
of arrangement work should search the keyword combination of "barter," "trade" and "exchange" online, and send a few emails or make a few phone calls to explore their options.
Disclaimer: Please be aware that I am not an attorney and that the contents of this article should not be construed as legal advice. If you have any questions of a legal nature, consult an attorney.